Shinseki v. Sanders
| Shinseki v. Sanders | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Decided April 21, 2009 | |
| Full case name | Shinseki v. Sanders |
| Citations | 556 U.S. 396 (more) |
| Holding | |
| The Federal Circuit's review of claims decisions made by the Department of Veterans Affairs must use the same harmless-error framework used in other civil cases. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Breyer, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito |
| Dissent | Souter, joined by Stevens, Ginsberg |
Shinseki v. Sanders, 556 U.S. 396 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the Federal Circuit's review of claims decisions made by the Department of Veterans Affairs must use the same harmless-error framework used in other civil cases.[1][2]
References
External links
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.
