United States v. Home Concrete & Supply, LLC
| United States v. Home Concrete & Supply, LLC | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Decided April 25, 2012 | |
| Full case name | United States v. Home Concrete & Supply, LLC |
| Citations | 566 U.S. 478 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Overstating the value of property sold in order to understate the profit made from the sale does not trigger the extended statute of limitations for the IRS to challenge the seller's tax forms. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
United States v. Home Concrete & Supply, LLC, 566 U.S. 478 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that overstating the value of property sold in order to understate the profit made from the sale does not trigger the extended statute of limitations for the IRS to challenge the seller's tax forms.[1][2]
Background
Ordinarily, the government must assess a deficiency against a taxpayer within "3 years after the return was filed" under 26 U. S. C. §6501(a). However, that period is extended to 6 years when a taxpayer "omits from gross income an amount properly includible therein which is in excess of 25 percent of the amount of gross income stated in the return" under §6501(e)(1)(A). Some taxpayers, including Home Concrete & Supply, overstated the basis of certain property that they had sold. As a result, their returns understated the gross income they received from the sale by an amount in excess of 25%. The Commissioner asserted the deficiency outside the 3-year limitations period but within the 6-year period. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the taxpayers' overstatements of basis, and resulting understatements of gross income, did not trigger the extended limitations period.[1]
Opinion of the court
The Supreme Court issued an opinion on April 25, 2012. The court affirmed. The decision was largely based on Colony, Inc. v. Commissioner, 357 U.S. 28, in which the court had interpreted similar language.[1]
Later developments
References
External links
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.
