White v. Woodall

White v. Woodall
Decided April 23, 2014
Full case nameWhite v. Woodall
Citations572 U.S. 415 (more)
Holding
The rejection of the requested jury instruction in this case was not objectively unreasonable or contrary to clearly established law, so the defendant did not satisfy the requirements for seeking habeas relief under AEDPA.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityScalia, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, Kagan
DissentBreyer, joined by Ginsburg, Sotomayor
Laws applied
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996

White v. Woodall, 572 U.S. 415 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the rejection of the requested jury instruction in this case was not objectively unreasonable or contrary to clearly established law, so the defendant did not satisfy the requirements for seeking habeas relief under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA).[1][2]

Background

Woodall pleaded guilty to capital murder; capital kidnapping; and first-degree rape, the statutory aggravating circumstance for the murder. He was sentenced to death after the trial court denied defense counsel's request to instruct the jury not to draw any adverse inference from respondent's decision not to testify at the penalty phase. The Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed, finding that the Fifth Amendment's requirement of a no-adverse-inference instruction to protect a non-testifying defendant at the guilt phase[a] is not required at the penalty phase. Subsequently, the federal District Court granted Woodall habeas relief, holding that the trial court's refusal to give the requested instruction violated respondent's privilege against self-incrimination. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.[1]

Opinion of the court

The Supreme Court issued an opinion on April 23, 2014. The Supreme Court reversed.[1]

Later developments

Notes

  1. ^ Articulated in Carter v. Kentucky (1981).

References

  1. ^ a b c White v. Woodall, 572 U.S. 415 (2014).
  2. ^ Steiker, Jordan (April 24, 2014). "Opinion analysis: Extending limitations on habeas relief". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved October 23, 2025.
  • Text of White v. Woodall, 572 U.S. 415 (2014) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.